marine insurancePosts by

Hull war premiums halved in six days after the ceasefire, from ~5% to ~2% of vessel value, but London underwriters are not celebrating: rates sit ~20x above baseline and won’t normalize until the Joint War Committee de-lists the area. That de-listing waits on sustained safety and settled governance, which wait on the institution that does not exist. Frequency risk fell with the ceasefire; severity risk, the institutional part, did not. This post reads the insurance recovery and its institutional gate.

The Lloyd’s Market Association says it plainly: 88% of the war market still wants the hull business, cover is available — ‘the reason ships are not moving is not through a lack of insurance; it is… crew and vessel safety being assessed by the ship masters and owners as too high.’ The bottleneck isn’t money; it’s the missing institutional safety net — salvage, ports of refuge, casualty investigation, central safety certification. The underwriters just made the site’s argument for it.

On 18-19 May 2026, Iranian state-affiliated reporting disclosed ‘Hormuz Safe,’ a crypto-settled state-backed marine insurance product for vessels using the PGSA corridor. The launch lands the day after the PGSA formal announcement. This post reads what Hormuz Safe can and cannot do relative to the International Group P&I cover the global operator class actually uses, and what a treaty-backed authority would do differently.